Interpretation of Humanistic Connotation of Digital Media Visual Expression from the Perspective of Design Aesthetics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/y1cr2708Keywords:
Design aesthetics, digital media, visual expression, humanistic connotation, visual semiotics, Bauhaus, Manovich, algorithmic aesthetics, cultural memory, human-centred designAbstract
Today, visual meaning is created, communicated and received predominantly through visual expression in digital media: interface design, motion graphics, data visualisation and algorithmically generated images. This paper argues that the humanistic connotation of digital media visual expression is not completely understood by formality aesthetics or technical functionality, but needs a design aesthetics context that combines the Bauhaus heritage of form-function unity, Barthes' semiological interpretation of visual meaning, and Manovich's cultural logic of new media. Three dimensions of humanistic connotation are identified and analysed: the cultural memory dimension, where digital visual forms encode and transmit collective identity and historical consciousness; the empathic dimension, where human-centred interface and interaction design builds affective relationships between users and digital environments; and the critical dimension, where design aesthetics enables the identification and resistance of algorithmic visual homogenisation as a threat to cultural diversity and humanistic plurality. The article also contends that the spread of AI-generated images and platform-driven design uniformity provide a structural challenge to the humanistic roots of digital visual culture. It finishes with a framework for a humanistic design practice that prioritises cultural specificity, embodied aesthetics and ethical visual communication as essential design values.
Downloads
References
[1] Whitford, F. (1984). Bauhaus. Thames and Hudson.
[2] European Commission. (2023). New European Bauhaus Compass. European Commission. https://new-european-bauhaus.europa.eu/system/files/2023-01/NEB_Compass_V_4.pdf
[3] Barthes, R. (1977). Image-music-text (S. Heath, Trans.). Fontana Press.
[4] Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. MIT Press.
[5] Zhou, K. (2024). Spectral archives: The afterlife of analog aesthetics in digital visual media. Visual Culture and Media Arts, 1(2), 1–18.
[6] Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things (Rev. ed.). Basic Books.
[7] Minet, A., Wentzel, D., Raff, S., & Garbas, J. (2024). Design thinking in physical and virtual environments: Conceptual foundations, qualitative analysis, and practical implications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 207, Article 123596.
[8] Fuentes, M. F. O., & Marin-Gutierrez, C. (2026). Typographies, faces and emotions: The visual language codes in mental health communication. Mediterranean Journal of Communication, 17(1), 77–93.
[9] Bhattacharya, A. (2024). Data visualization as artistic expression. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(1), 1–12.
[10] Park, S., & Kim, J. (2025). Drowning in the same style: How database creation within online design platforms influences visual homogenization. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 18, Article 100658.
[11] Günay, M. (2025). Algorithmic bias and visual representation in digital design: Sociocultural reflections of artificial intelligence outputs. TURAN-SAM, 17(68), 239–248.
[12] Gunay, M. (2025). The risk of homogenization in visual culture: The impact of AI algorithms on aesthetic diversity and originality. Izlek Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 1–15.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.










