Analysis on the Problematization of International Relations from the Perspective of Digital Interculturality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/tsm1bc18Keywords:
Digital interculturality, international relations, intercultural communication, diplomacy, digital media, problematizationAbstract
Digital interculturality refers to the modes by which digital media, translation systems and networked platforms facilitate cross-border encounters in culture. This paper believes that digital interculturality does not only help people of different cultures communicate more easily but also raises problems in international relations by altering the understanding that states, publics and institutions have of identity, trust, conflict and diplomacy. Based on intercultural communication studies, digital media scholarship and an intercultural theory of international relations, this paper shows that digital platforms have increased the visibility, shortened the time, and expanded the circulation of symbols and narratives. Altered circumstances have been created in foreign relations as a result of the above changes. Three levels of a conceptual analysis are introduced in this paper: mediation of meanings, reorganisation of diplomatic interaction, and the emergence of digitally amplified misrecognition and contestation. Therefore, digital interculturality should be understood as a space for communication and, at the same time, as a problem area where the cultural, political and epistemic foundations of international relations can be investigated.
Downloads
References
[1] de Oliveira, M. M., & Conti, L. (Eds.). (2025). Explorations in digital interculturality: Language, culture, and postdigital practices. transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839476291
[2] de Oliveira, M. M., & Conti, L. (2025). Interculturality and postdigital communicative practice: Building interdisciplinary pathways between intercultural communication, sociolinguistics, and related fields. In M. M. de Oliveira & L. Conti (Eds.), Explorations in digital interculturality: Language, culture, and postdigital practices (pp. 11–38). transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839476291-003
[3] Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.
[4] Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford University Press.
[5] Friedrichs, J. (2016). An intercultural theory of international relations: How self-worth underlies politics among nations. International Theory, 8(1), 63–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971915000202
[6] Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Polity Press.
[7] Rosenau, J. N. (1990). Turbulence in world politics: A theory of change and continuity. Princeton University Press.
[8] Neumann, I. B. (2002). Returning practice to the linguistic turn: The case of diplomacy. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 31(3), 627–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310031201
[9] Hjarvard, S. (2013). The mediatization of culture and society. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203155363
[10] VSquare. (2023, November 8). Slovak election targeted by pro-Kremlin deepfake hoax. VSquare Official Website.
[11] UNESCO. (n.d.). Case study: Can we believe what we hear? AI-generated audio deepfakes in elections. UNESCO MIL4Teachers Website.
[12] ReDICo. (2025, October 13). Impressions from the launch of the Centre for Digital Interculturality Studies. ReDICo Official Website.
[13] Stuart, J. (2024, November 21). Digital cultural diffusion: How digital technologies shape intercultural understanding. United Nations University Macau Website.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.










