Deterritorialisation and Reterritorialisation: The Breakthroughs and Predicaments of Postmodern Design from a Deleuzian Perspective

Authors

  • Xiaojie Su School of Design and Art, Jingdezhen Ceramic University, Jingdezhen, China
  • Xinghui Zhu School of Design and Art, Jingdezhen Ceramic University, Jingdezhen, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ag855370

Keywords:

Deleuzian philosophy, territorialisation, deterritorialization, reterritorialization, postmodern design

Abstract

Drawing on Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari’s concepts of territorialisation, deterritorialisation, and reterritorialisation, this article examines how postmodern design challenged modernist norms and the predicaments that emerged from this process. It conceptualises the institutionalisation of modernism as a relatively stable order structured by functionalism, standardisation, and formal purity, and analyses how postmodern design unsettled this order through historical quotation, symbolic collage, and the recombination of heterogeneous elements. The study argues that postmodern design broadened the possibilities for expressing emotion, historical memory, and cultural identity. Yet, through dissemination and commercialisation, these forms of difference were transformed into marketable styles and markers of identity, resulting in the stylisation of design language, the superficial treatment of cultural meaning, and the blurring of evaluative boundaries. Postmodern design did not simply replace modernism; rather, it developed through the continuing interplay between deterritorialisation and reterritorialisation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Hu, X. Y. (2012). A study of Deleuze’s philosophy of difference and aesthetics. Doctoral dissertation, Fudan University.

[2] Huang, W. T., & Wu, G. N. (2025). Exploration of design thought in the context of the disenchantment of the world: From the perspective of Deleuzian philosophy. Chongqing Architecture, 24(4), 23-26.

[3] Chen, A. Y. (2021). The core issues of postmodernism and reflections on transcending modernity. Decoration, (3), 12-17.

[4] Chen, A. Y. (2005). A brief analysis of postmodern design concepts. Art Observation, (8), 107-112.

[5] Wu, J. (2013). The creative production of difference from the perspective of the anti-dialectical spirit in Deleuze’s philosophy. Journal of Hohai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 15(3), 22-26, 91.

[6] Xu, H. X. (2025). Encountering the transcendental: Deleuze and the ontology of design. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 16(2), 75-80.

[7] Liu, W. L. (2013). The paradoxical implications of postmodern design from the perspective of deconstruction. Art Research, (2), 120-122.

[8] Lu, C. (2022). Knowledge production and pedagogical concepts in postmodern design. Shaanxi Education (Higher Education), (5), 32-33.

[9] Brassett, J. (2015). Poised and complex: The becoming each other of philosophy, design and innovation. In B. Marenko & J. Brassett (Eds.), Deleuze and Design (pp. range unspecified). Edinburgh University Press.

Downloads

Published

31-07-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Su, X., & Zhu, X. (2026). Deterritorialisation and Reterritorialisation: The Breakthroughs and Predicaments of Postmodern Design from a Deleuzian Perspective. Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 2(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.54097/ag855370