A Foucauldian Discourse Analysis of Anatomy of a Fall
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ss43ew40Keywords:
Anatomy of a Fall, discourse, the Second Sex, power, identity reversalAbstract
The film Anatomy of a Fall revolves around a judicial trial, with a pronounced focus on gender issues. It traces the complete trajectory of the case surrounding the death of Sandra's husband, Samuel-from the initial incident to the courtroom proceedings that ultimately result in Sandra's acquittal. Throughout the film, the discourses articulated by the prosecution, witnesses, and the defendant engage in strategic contestation, each striving to reinterpret the case and legitimize their respective versions of events as objective truth. Drawing upon Michel Foucault's theory of discourse, this paper aims to examine the constitutive function of these multiple voices in constructing reality within the cinematic narrative.
Downloads
References
[1] Zhou, X. (2013). A critique of Foucault's discourse theory. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, (1), 121–129.
[2] Li, Z. (2017). From power-discourse to discursive power: A philosophical critique of Foucault's discourse theory. New Horizons, (2), 108–113.
[3] Simone de Beauvoir. (2011). The second sex (Vol. 1) (Z. Kelu, Trans.). Shanghai Translation Publishing House.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.










