The Role of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Personalised Learning: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ynadcp26Keywords:
Generative artificial intelligence, personalised learning, adaptive learning, higher education, educational technology, AI literacyAbstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), especially large language models, has enhanced personalised learning by enabling dynamic content creation, conversational assistance, adaptive feedback, and fast resource creation. Nevertheless, technical capability cannot be translated into educational value. This systematic literature review explores the potential of GenAI to improve personalised learning in higher education and determines technological, pedagogical, ethical, and institutional circumstances of implementation. A systematic search of Web of Science and PsycINFO yielded 201 records; following the elimination of duplicates and sequential screening, 18 articles published in 2020-2025 were selected. Thematic synthesis and co-occurrence mapping revealed opportunities in learner-specific content, adaptive tutoring, self-directed learning, accessibility, assessment support, and educator productivity. Constant threats involved hallucinated or biased results, privacy and copyright issues, academic-integrity pressures, unequal access, and cognitive offloading that can undermine critical engagement. There is a lot of evidence that is conceptual, short-term, or grounded on perceived usefulness as opposed to long term learning outcomes. The review supports a human-centred paradigm in which GenAI does not replace but complements teachers. To adopt it responsibly, one needs verified content, redesigning of assessments, open governance, fair access, and clear AI literacy among staff and students. These factors define whether GenAI can offer valuable scaffolding or simply produce answers.
Downloads
References
[1] Rensfeldt, A. B., & Rahm, L. (2022). Automating teacher work? A history of the politics of automation and artificial intelligence in education. Postdigital Science and Education, 5(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00344-x
[2] Mallikarjuna, B., & Chittemsetty, P. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence: Fundamentals and evolution. In Generative AI: Current Trends and Applications (pp. 3–17). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-8460-8_1
[3] Renugadevi, R., Shobana, J., Arthi, K., Kalpana, A. V., Satishkumar, D., & Sivaraja, M. (2024). Real-time applications of artificial intelligence technology in daily operations. In Advances in Computational Intelligence and Robotics Book Series (pp. 243–257). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2615-2.ch012
[4] Powell, W., & Kusuma-Powell, O. (2011). How to teach now: Five keys to personalized learning in the global classroom. ASCD.
[5] Elmourabit, Z., Retbi, A., & El Faddouli, N. E. (2024). The impact of generative artificial intelligence on education: A comparative study. European Conference on E-Learning, 23(1), 470–476. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecel.23.1.2975
[6] Granda, B. S., Inzhivotkina, Y., Ibáñez, F., & Gustavo, J. (2024). Educational innovation: Exploring the potential of generative artificial intelligence in cognitive schema building. Edutec Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 89, 44–63. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2024.89.3251
[7] Rawat, S., Mittal, S., Nehra, D., Sharma, C., & Kamboj, D. (2023). Exploring the potential of ChatGPT to improve experiential learning in education. The 5th International Conference on Information Management & Machine Intelligence, 83(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3647444.3647910
[8] Faccia, A., Ridon, M., Beebeejaun, Z., & Mosteanu, N. (2023). Advancements and challenges of generative AI in higher educational content creation: A technical perspective. In ICISE ’23: Proceedings of the 2023 8th International Conference on Information Systems Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1145/3641032.3641055
[9] Mithi, J., Madzvamuse, S., Mbanje, S., & Lomahoza, S. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence and formative assessment: Perspectives from higher education in South Africa. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education Research, 1(1), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.34190/icer.1.1.3231
[10] Wu, D., Zhang, S., Ma, Z., Yue, X.-G., & Dong, R. K. (2024). Unlocking potential: Key factors shaping undergraduate self-directed learning in AI-enhanced educational environments. Systems, 12(9), 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12090332
[11] Gupta, N., Khatri, K., Malik, Y., Lakhani, A., Kanwal, A., Aggarwal, S., & Dahuja, A. (2024a). Exploring prospects, hurdles, and road ahead for generative artificial intelligence in orthopedic education and training. BMC Medical Education, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06592-8
[12] Yan, L., Greiff, S., Teuber, Z., & Gašević, D. (2024). Promises and challenges of generative artificial intelligence for human learning. Nature Human Behaviour, 8(10), 1839–1850. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02004-5
[13] Chauhan, J. A., Bhatt, P. P., & Raval, D. K. (2024). The impact of generative AI in modern education system in India. In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (pp. 593–603). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-6684-0_48
[14] Gabriel, S. (2024). Generative AI and educational (in)equity. International Conference on AI Research, 4(1), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.34190/icair.4.1.3153
[15] Yogi, M. K., Chowdary, Y. R., & Santhoshi, C. P. R. S. (2024). Impact of generative AI models on personalized learning and adaptive systems. In Empowering Digital Education with ChatGPT (pp. 83–97). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781032716350-6
[16] Freise, L. R., & Ritz, E. (2024). Using ChatGPT to prepare for your dream job? In Chapman and Hall/CRC EBooks (pp. 142–155). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781032716350-10
[17] Miao, J., Thongprayoon, C., Craici, I. M., & Cheungpasitporn, W. (2024). How to incorporate generative artificial intelligence in nephrology fellowship education. Journal of Nephrology, 37(9), 2491–2497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-024-02165-6
[18] Tang, V., Wong, L., Lam, H. Y., & Tang, Y. M. (2024). Amplifying learning and teaching effectiveness through generative artificial intelligence: A qualitative approach with case studies on supply chain and cold chain management. In International Conference on Decision Science & Management (pp. 264–269). https://doi.org/10.1145/3686081.3686126
[19] Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
[20] Ilieva, G., Yankova, T., Klisarova-Belcheva, S., Dimitrov, A., Bratkov, M., & Angelov, D. (2023). Effects of generative chatbots in higher education. Information, 14(9), 492. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14090492
[21] Arslan, B., Lehman, B., Tenison, C., Sparks, J. R., López, A. A., Gu, L., & Zapata-Rivera, D. (2024). Opportunities and challenges of using generative AI to personalize educational assessment. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1460651
[22] Gupta, S., Dharamshi, R. R., & Kakde, V. (2024b). An impactful and revolutionized educational ecosystem using generative AI to assist and assess the teaching and learning benefits, fostering the post-pandemic requirements. In 2024 Second International Conference on Emerging Trends in Information Technology and Engineering (ICETITE). https://doi.org/10.1109/ic-etite58242.2024.10493370
[23] Li, Y., Ji, W., Liu, J., & Li, W. (2024). Application of generative artificial intelligence technology in customized learning path design: A new strategy for higher education. In 2024 International Conference on Interactive Intelligent Systems and Techniques (IIST) (pp. 567–573). https://doi.org/10.1109/iist62526.2024.00099
[24] Gupta, A. (2024). Impact of generative AI in transforming higher education pedagogy. In Advances in Business Information Systems and Analytics Book Series (pp. 285–300). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0815-8.ch017
[25] Zhang, Y., & Miao, M. (2024). The roles and functions of foreign language teachers of China in the context of generative artificial intelligence. In 2024 International Conference on Intelligent Education and Computer Technology (pp. 584–586). https://doi.org/10.1145/3687311.3687415
[26] Roy, A. D., Das, D., Dasgupta, S., & Roy, R. D. (2024). The use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in teaching and assessment of postgraduate students in pathology and microbiology. Indian Journal of Microbiology Research, 11(3), 140–146. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijmr.2024.027
[27] Pereira, C. S., Ferreira, M. J., Sobral, S. R., Durão, N., & Moreira, F. (2024). Enhancing higher education in Portugal: Leveraging generative artificial intelligence for learning-teaching process. European Conference on E-Learning, 23(1), 289–298. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecel.23.1.2503
[28] Silva, P. (2015). Davis’ technology acceptance model (TAM) (1989). In Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption (pp. 205–219). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8156-9.ch013
[29] Bada, S. O., & Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66–70.
[30] Wittrock, M. C. (1974). Learning as a generative process. Educational Psychologist, 11(2), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461527409529129
[31] Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
[32] Hannes, K., & Claes, L. (2007). Learn to read and write systematic reviews: The Belgian Campbell Group. Research on Social Work Practice, 17(6), 748–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731507303106
[33] Johnson, B. R., De Li, S., Larson, D. B., & McCullough, M. (2000). A systematic review of the religiosity and delinquency literature. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 16(1), 32–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986200016001003
[34] Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887
[35] Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
[36] Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
[37] Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
[38] Pesovski, I., Santos, R., Henriques, R., & Trajkovik, V. (2024). Generative AI for customizable learning experiences. Sustainability, 16(7), 3034. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16073034
[39] Rathika, P., Yamunadevi, S., Ponni, P., Parthipan, V., & Anju, P. (2024). Developing an AI-powered interactive virtual tutor for enhanced learning experiences. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.782
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
