Platformed Empowerment across Pop Markets and the Viral Intimacy and Curated Hybridity of PinkPantheress and Lexie Liu

Authors

  • Yumeng Hu Department of Music, School of Humanities, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/dqv9qg28

Keywords:

Platformization, popular music, gender, authenticity, cultural hybridity, PinkPantheress, Lexie Liu

Abstract

This article advances a comparative hermeneutic account of how PinkPantheress and Lexie Liu orchestrate aesthetic sovereignty and audience connection within institutionally differentiated popular-music platform ecologies. It reconceptualizes empowerment as a situated capacity to author music, calibrate visibility and sustain semiotically recognizable relations with listeners instead of treating popularity as a self-evident measure of autonomy. A comparative qualitative case study examines a purposive corpus of public interviews, artist-controlled audiovisual releases, platform pages and question-and-answer exchanges published between 2019 and 2025. Reflexive thematic and multimodal content analysis identifies two contrasting yet convergent aesthetic dispositifs. PinkPantheress develops viral intimacy through compressed songs, understated self-presentation, domestic production narratives and selective privacy. Lexie Liu develops curated hybridity through bilingual writing, sumptuous audiovisual world-building and controlled movement between Chinese and global cultural references. In both cases, authorship and persona become resources for relational legibility. Platform visibility nonetheless produces infrastructural dependency. Viral legibility can constrict future expectations and cross-cultural legibility can invite reductive exegesis. The comparison proposes platformed empowerment as a negotiated and reversible constellation of creative control, platform affordances and audience recognition. The article contributes a circumspect cross-market framework that refuses to treat artists as national synecdoches or public engagement metrics as incontrovertible evidence of loyalty.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Nieborg, D. B., & Poell, T. (2018). The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4275–4292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818769694

[2] Poell, T., Nieborg, D., & van Dijck, J. (2019). Platformisation. Internet Policy Review, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1425

[3] Helmond, A. (2015). The platformization of the web: Making web data platform ready. Social Media + Society, 1(2), Article 2056305115603080. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603080

[4] Prey, R. (2018). Nothing personal: Algorithmic individuation on music streaming platforms. Media, Culture & Society, 40(7), 1086–1100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717745147

[5] Morris, J. W., & Powers, D. (2015). Control, curation and musical experience in streaming music services. Creative Industries Journal, 8(2), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/17510694.2015.1090222

[6] Bonini, T., & Gandini, A. (2019). “First week is editorial, second week is algorithmic”: Platform gatekeepers and the platformization of music curation. Social Media + Society, 5(4), Article 2056305119880006. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119880006

[7] Eriksson, M. (2020). The editorial playlist as container technology: On Spotify and the logistical role of digital music packages. Journal of Cultural Economy, 13(4), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2019.1708780

[8] Hagen, A. N. (2015). The playlist experience: Personal playlists in music streaming services. Popular Music and Society, 38(5), 625–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007766.2015.1021174

[9] Arditi, D. (2018). Digital subscriptions: The unending consumption of music in the digital era. Popular Music and Society, 41(3), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007766.2016.1264101

[10] Negus, K. (2019). From creator to data: The post record music industry and the digital conglomerates. Media, Culture & Society, 41(3), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718799395

[11] Watson, A., Watson, J. B., & Tompkins, L. (2023). Does social media pay for music artists? Quantitative evidence on the co evolution of social media, streaming and live music. Journal of Cultural Economy, 16(1), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2022.2087720

[12] Hracs, B. J. (2012). A creative industry in transition: The rise of digitally driven independent music production. Growth and Change, 43(3), 442–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468 2257.2012.00593.x

[13] Haynes, J., & Marshall, L. (2018). Reluctant entrepreneurs: Musicians and entrepreneurship in the ‘new’ music industry. The British Journal of Sociology, 69(2), 459–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468 4446.12286

[14] Morris, J. W. (2014). Artists as entrepreneurs, fans as workers. Popular Music and Society, 37(3), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007766.2013.778534

[15] Kribs, K. (2018). Popular music as promotion: Music and branding in the digital age [Book review of Leslie M. Meier]. Canadian Journal of Communication, 43(4), 6–8. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2018v43n4a3400

[16] Kaye, D. B. V., Chen, X., & Zeng, J. (2021). The co evolution of two Chinese mobile short video apps: Parallel platformization of Douyin and TikTok. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(2), 229–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920952120

[17] Zulli, D., & Zulli, D. J. (2022). Extending the Internet meme: Conceptualizing technological mimesis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform. New Media & Society, 24(8), 1872–1890. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820983603

[18] Abidin, C. (2020). Mapping Internet celebrity on TikTok: Exploring attention economies and visibility labours. Cultural Science Journal, 12(1), 77–103. https://doi.org/10.5334/csci.140

[19] de Kloet, J., Poell, T., Zeng, G., & Chow, Y. F. (2019). The platformization of Chinese society: Infrastructure, governance, and practice. Chinese Journal of Communication, 12(3), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2019.1644008

[20] Zhang, Q. (2025). Adaptation and optimisation across audiovisual platforms: Hot song production in the Chinese music industry. Popular Music, 44(1), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261143025000297

[21] Fung, A. Y. H. (2007). The emerging (national) popular music culture in China. Inter Asia Cultural Studies, 8(3), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649370701393824

[22] de Kloet, J. (2005). Popular music and youth in urban china: The dakou generation. The China Quarterly, 183, 609–626. https://doi.org/10.1017/s030574100500038x

[23] Gill, R. (2007). Postfeminist media culture: Elements of a sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549407075898

[24] McRobbie, A. (2004). Post feminism and popular culture. Feminist Media Studies, 4(3), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/1468077042000309937

[25] Banet Weiser, S., Gill, R., & Rottenberg, C. (2020). Postfeminism, popular feminism and neoliberal feminism? Sarah Banet Weiser, Rosalind Gill and Catherine Rottenberg in conversation. Feminist Theory, 21(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700119842555

[26] Dosekun, S. (2015). For Western girls only?: Post feminism as transnational culture. Feminist Media Studies, 15(6), 960–975. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2015.1062991

[27] Gill, R., & Orgad, S. (2018). The amazing bounce backable woman: Resilience and the psychological turn in neoliberalism. Sociological Research Online, 23(2), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418769673

[28] Mendes, K. (2012). ‘Feminism rules! Now, where’s my swimsuit?’ Re evaluating feminist discourse in print media 1968–2008. Media, Culture & Society, 34(5), 554–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443712442701

[29] Gill, R., & Orgad, S. (2015). The confidence cult(ure). Australian Feminist Studies, 30(86), 324–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2016.1148001

[30] Duffy, B. E., & Hund, E. (2015). “Having it all” on social media: Entrepreneurial femininity and self branding among fashion bloggers. Social Media + Society, 1(2), Article 2056305115604337. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115604337

[31] Khamis, S., Ang, L., & Welling, R. (2017). Self branding, ‘micro celebrity’ and the rise of social media influencers. Celebrity Studies, 8(2), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2016.1218292

[32] Marwick, A., & boyd, d. (2011). To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 17(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856510394539

[33] Driessens, O. (2013). Celebrity capital: Redefining celebrity using field theory. Theory and Society, 42(5), 543–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186 013 9202 3

[34] Abidin, C. (2016). Visibility labour: Engaging with influencers’ fashion brands and #OOTD advertorial campaigns on Instagram. Media International Australia, 161(1), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878x16665177

[35] Audrezet, A., de Kerviler, G., & Guidry Moulard, J. (2020). Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self presentation. Journal of Business Research, 117, 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.008

[36] Moulard, J. G., Garrity, C. P., & Rice, D. H. (2015). What makes a human brand authentic? Identifying the antecedents of celebrity authenticity. Psychology & Marketing, 32(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20771

[37] Baym, N. K. (2015). Connect with your audience! The relational labor of connection. The Communication Review, 18(1), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2015.996401

[38] Baym, N. K. (2013). Data not seen: The uses and shortcomings of social media metrics. First Monday, 18(10). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i10.4873

[39] Click, M. A., Lee, H., & Holladay, H. W. (2013). Making monsters: Lady Gaga, fan identification, and social media. Popular Music and Society, 36(3), 360–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007766.2013.798546

[40] Labrecque, L. I. (2014). Fostering consumer brand relationships in social media environments: The role of parasocial interaction. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(2), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.003

[41] Schau, H. J., Muñiz, A. M., Jr., & Arnould, E. J. (2009). How brand community practices create value. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 30–51. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.5.30

[42] Hollebeek, L. D., Glynn, M. S., & Brodie, R. J. (2014). Consumer brand engagement in social media: Conceptualization, scale development and validation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(2), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.002

[43] Kraidy, M. M. (2002). Hybridity in cultural globalization. Communication Theory, 12(3), 316–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468 2885.2002.tb00272.x

[44] Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Public Culture, 2(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363 2 2 1

[45] Born, G. (2010). For a relational musicology: Music and interdisciplinarity, beyond the practice turn: The 2007 Dent Medal Address. Journal of the Royal Musical Association, 135(2), 205–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/02690403.2010.506265

[46] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

[47] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

[48] Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), Article 1609406917733847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

[49] Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529682571

[50] Striphas, T. (2015). Algorithmic culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4 5), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415577392

Downloads

Published

24-09-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hu, Y. (2026). Platformed Empowerment across Pop Markets and the Viral Intimacy and Curated Hybridity of PinkPantheress and Lexie Liu. Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 2(2), 42-51. https://doi.org/10.54097/dqv9qg28