An Analysis of Regional Cultural Differentiation of Huqin Instruments: Erhu, Xiqin and Morin Khuur From a Comparative Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/w4efmc56Keywords:
Huqin instrument, Haegeum, horse head string instrument, regional culture, cultural differentiationAbstract
Originating from the nomadic production system of the northern Xí people during the Wei, Jin, and Northern-Southern Dynasties, the ancient Xiqin is a highly representative early bowed string instrument in ancient China and the common ancestor of today's erhu, Korean Xiqin, and Mongolian horsehead fiddle. After the Wei and Jin periods, frequent migrations and deep cultural integration among northern nomadic groups intensified regional cultural exchanges. The ancient Xiqin, originally rooted in the northern grasslands, gradually spread outward, reaching the agricultural heartland of central China, the mountainous Korean settlements in northeastern China, and the vast Mongolian steppes. Due to significant differences in natural geography, production modes, and aesthetic systems across various regions, the ancient Xiqin did not remain fixed in its original form upon arrival in different areas. Instead, it underwent continuous adaptive improvements and artistic reconfigurations tailored to local cultural characteristics. Over time, prolonged regional influences and artistic accumulations led to distinct artistic divergences in instrument structure, acoustic properties, performance practices, and folk applications for this originally unified instrument, ultimately giving rise to several regionally identifiable and artistically independent branches of the huqin family. Based on the theoretical framework of comparative musicology, and integrating existing academic research with primary data collected through fieldwork, this study explores the internal driving mechanisms behind regional cultural differences in shaping the artistic evolution of these three huqin types, focusing on four core dimensions: instrument evolution, craftsmanship features, performance aesthetics, and folk cultural values. It systematically summarizes the key patterns underlying their localized development. The research clarifies the deep logic connecting regional humanistic environments with traditional musical instrument evolution, and identifies the core characteristics of indigenous adaptation and coexistence of multiple forms in the development of related instruments. The findings provide solid theoretical support and practical guidance for the living preservation of ethnic minority traditional instruments and the inheritance and innovation of huqin art.
Downloads
References
[1] Qiao, Y., Li, H., & Zhang, X. (2022). CCOM-HuQin: An annotated multimodal Chinese fiddle performance dataset. Transactions of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval, 6(1), 60–74.
[2] Lu, R. (2021). Ecomusicology of Qinpai erhu in the Guanzhong region of Shaanxi. Asian Social Science, 21(4), 44–53.
[3] Marsh, P. K. (2014). Sonic heritage and nomadic identity: Morin khuur performance in post-socialist Mongolia. Ethnomusicology Forum, 23(2), 187–208.
[4] Stock, J. P. J. (2017). Erhu as national instrument: Regional styles and modern canon formation in Chinese bowed string music. Journal of Asian Music, 48(1), 1–27.
[5] Pegg, C. (2015). Horsehead fiddle and soundscapes of the Mongolian grasslands. The World of Music, 3(1), 79–98.
[6] Lee, J. H. (2019). The xiqin in Korea and China: Divergent cultural trajectories of a common bowed lute ancestor. Yearbook for Traditional Music, 51, 113–134.
[7] Van Aalst, L. (2020). Bowed lutes across Eurasia: Historical diffusion and regional adaptation of spike fiddles. Journal of the International Council for Traditional Music, 72, 45–62.
[8] Wang, Y. (2023). Acoustic and cultural boundaries: Timbre conception of erhu in Jiangnan and northern China. Music Perception, 40(4), 389–407.
[9] Tsering, B. (2024). Morin khuur between ritual, folk and concert stage: Cultural recontextualization in Inner Mongolia. Asian Ethnomusicology, 13(1), 56–77.
[10] Kim, M. S. (2016). The xiqin: A forgotten ancestor of East Asian fiddles and its medieval cultural context. Journal of Musicological Research, 35(3–4), 241–264.
[11] Jones, S. (2018). Instrument, region and repertoire: Huqin in North Chinese opera traditions. Ethnomusicology, 62(3), 412–434.
[12] Baatar, D. (2025). Naming and transformations of morin khuur: Historical observations on instrument terminology. Mongolian Studies, 47, 363–368.
[13] Yang, L. (2020). The global revival of traditional Chinese instruments: A case study on the erhu. Journal of Asian Music, 51(2), 123–140.
[14] Li, M. (2022). Organology and cultural meaning: The material culture of Chinese bowed fiddles. Galpin Society Journal, 75, 97–114.
[15] Sneath, D. (2017). Sounding the steppe: Music, landscape and identity in Inner Mongolia. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 23(S1), 142–160.
[16] Chen, H. (2019). Regional diversity and inheritance differences of Chinese huqin music culture. Chinese Studies, 8(3), 189–198.
[17] Bold, B. (2021). Timbre and ritual: The cultural semantics of morin khuur in Mongolian shamanic traditions. Journal of Ritual Studies, 35(2), 56–63.
[18] Park, S. (2018). The disappearance and reconstruction of xiqin culture in East Asia. International Journal of Traditional Music Studies, 10, 78–92.
[19] Zhao, X. (2022). Cultural geography of erhu art: Landscape, custom and musical aesthetics. Journal of Cultural Geography, 39(5), 612–628.
[20] Munkhbat, L. (2023). Nomadic culture and the evolution of Mongolian bowed string instruments. Central Asian Studies, 11(2), 201–215.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.










